MCP Danish Cancer Society
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
R800001-MCP200v1
7/10/1850    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Glossary
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Decramer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schanstra, J. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Decramer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schanstra, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on April 15, 2008
Revised on July 15, 2008
Accepted on July 30, 2008

Urine in clinical proteomics

Stéphane Decramer, Anne Gonzalez de Peredo, Benjamin Breuil, Harald Mischak, Bernard Monsarrat, Jean-Loup Bascands, and Joost P. Schanstra

U858, Equipe 5, Inserm - I2MR, Toulouse, Cedex 4 31432

Corresponding Author: joost-peter.schanstra{at}inserm.fr

Urine has become one of the most attractive biofluids in clinical proteomics as it can be obtained non-invasively, in large quantities and is stable compared to other biofluids. The urinary proteome has been studied by almost any proteomic technology, but mass-spectrometry-based urinary protein and peptide profiling has emerged as most suitable for clinical application. After a period of descriptive urinary proteomics the field is moving out of the discovery phase into an era of validation of urinary biomarkers in larger prospective studies. Although, mainly due to the site of production of urine, the majority of these studies apply to the kidney and the urinary tract, recent data shows that analysis of the urinary proteome can also be highly informative on non urogenital diseases and be used in their classification. Despite this progress in urinary biomarker discovery, the contribution of urinary proteomics to the understanding of the pathophysiology of disease upon analysis of the urinary proteome is still modest, mainly due to problems associated to sequence identification of the biomarkers. Until now, research has focused on the highly abundant urinary proteins and peptides but analysis of the less abundant, and naturally existing urinary proteins and peptides still remains a challenge. In conclusion, urine has evolved as one of the most attractive bodyfluids in clinical proteomics with, potentially, a rapid application in the clinic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.